🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart atomic discussions with the United States on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed new appeals had been made by mediators to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be operating from a stance of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Discussions Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader claiming the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in some form if talks restart.

The US president recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his speech to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by military means. He stated the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to enforce their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the primary resolution to settle disputes, but its requirements, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a response in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and machinery, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the wake of this attack."